Product managers
State the goal once.
Masonly asks the follow-up questions and keeps the answers. You stop re-explaining the same idea in every meeting.
State a goal in Slack. Masonly asks why, brings engineering in from the first message, and writes one spec that both sides sign.
I asked for one field on the profile. Why are we still talking about it?
We found the gap three weeks in. Nobody wrote down why we were building it.
We booked another meeting. Something still got dropped.
A solution arrives dressed as a requirement. The reason stays in someone's head. The fix today is more meetings, and things still get lost.
Keep the work where it happens: in Slack. Only the final review moves to the dashboard.
One message, in plain words. No template, no ticket.
User impact, business reason, why now, business value, the problem, how you will measure it, and the cost of doing nothing. A vague answer gets a sharper question. A truly unknown answer is marked unknown, never invented. Already talked it through on a call? Add the Zoom or Teams transcript, and Masonly takes the answers from it.
Product and engineering both agree on the split before any work starts.
Engineering is there from the first message. Masonly asks the feasibility questions an engineer would ask. It reads the code when there is a repository and pulls context from GitHub, Jira and Linear. Anyone can tag in the person who knows. Choices are one-click Slack buttons.
A clean Markdown document. Comments sit on highlights. Every requirement shows the decisions that led to it.
When a goal's specs are approved, Masonly sends a plain summary in Slack. No meeting needed to catch up.
Keep it where work happens, in Slack.
All of it is asynchronous. Nobody has to be in the same room or the same time zone.
These rules are part of the design. They are not settings.
It traces back to a goal and to the conversation that produced it.
Approval stays locked while the why is incomplete or a question is open.
Product and engineering must both approve. Change the goal, and both sign again.
No one edits the spec by hand. Nothing changes without a recorded reason.
Masonly works for brand-new products with no code yet, not only for existing codebases.
State the goal once.
Masonly asks the follow-up questions and keeps the answers. You stop re-explaining the same idea in every meeting.
Get the reason, not only the solution.
You are in the thread from the first message. You ask about feasibility before anyone starts to build.
Your client knows the business, not the tech.
Masonly asks a non-technical client plain questions and turns the answers into specs your team can build from.
Masonly reads only what you connect. You can also add meeting transcripts from Zoom or Microsoft Teams.
Goals start here. Every thread, question and one-click choice happens here.
Masonly reads the code to ask the feasibility questions an engineer would ask.
Masonly pulls context from the issues you link and cites them in the spec.
Masonly reads the Linear issues you paste into a thread and cites them too.
No. Masonly stops at approved specs. It does not write code, build, test or deploy. Your team builds from the specs.
No. Masonly works for brand-new products with no code yet. When you connect a repository, Masonly reads it before it calls anything feasible.
Masonly reads only what you connect: your Slack channels, repositories and issue trackers. Text from tickets and code is context for the spec. It is never treated as an instruction.
The product and engineering members of the project see every goal and spec in it. People tagged into a thread see that thread's work. Anyone else sees nothing.
Yes. When a goal's specs are approved, Masonly sends each executive a short summary in Slack. They can open the goal and its specs on the dashboard to read. They cannot edit or approve.
Masonly is in development. Leave your email. We will write to you when we can set up your team.